Safety Stock Optimization Case Study
Description
Determine an optimized time-phased inventory plan across your multi-echelon supply chain. Include all your inventory classifications including raw materials, work-in-process, cycle stock, in-transit, finished goods, and safety stock in order meet your desired customer service levels with the lowest investment in inventory. You can also develop an inventory plan based on a top-down budgetary constraint that will maximize fill rates while respecting the limit on working capital investments.
Sample questions this use case addresses
How much, where, and in what form should inventory for a product be held in the supply chain?
How can I evaluate the impact of network strategy and variability on inventory?
How can I explore trade-offs between service level objectives and inventory holding costs?
Where should I set push vs. pull boundaries (also known as decoupling points) in my supply chain (that is, make-to-stock vs. make-to-order)?
What inventory should I hold in order to maximize fill rates under a top-down budgetary constraint for inventory investment?
Typical use case inputs
Statistical distributions
Transit time
Production time
Lead Time
History or future orders
Demand Forecast
Forecast accuracy
Starting inventory by location
Current stocking and service policies
Facility capabilities
Typical use case outputs
Optimal inventory profiles
Time-phased safety stocks by product and location
Policy guidance by location
Expected inventory levels by period
Demand profile by facility and customers
Simulation runs to show inventory levels over time
Inventory strategy value
Companies often generalize and apply a days-of-sales target across all products. This one-size-fits-all approach has the benefit of being simple to administer. However, it may result in significantly over investing in some stock and not enough in others. Getting the mix right is critical for providing the targeted level of customer service at the lowest cost.
There are numerous formulas for safety stock based on lead time, variability and service level target. These approaches fail to consider the interdependencies across nodes in the supply chain. The closer to the final customer, typically the more intermittent and variable the demand signals become. As we look into the upstream supply chain, pooling demand signals results in smoother demand that is easier to forecast. The trade-off between inventory form and function is optimized and the right policy to stock each node is determined. This solution must include a holistic consideration of in-transit, cycle stock, WIP, quality holds, and safety stock.
Customization
Customization Level Required: Low
Details of Customization
DDM
Low level of customization required if any.
Model Building
Low level of customization required. Use the Safety Stock Optimization AMB template as a starting point. Incorporate additional variability to account for data such as transit time or production time statistical distributions. If required, incorporate starting inventory levels.
Last modified: Friday May 12, 2023